Veiled Malice Posted February 6, 2008 Author Share Posted February 6, 2008 Geez, two nat 20's on that run through. These guys want it, that's for sure. Okay, they are now using the Zig-Zag maneuver, this time in Close Terrain. There's no +2 for you here, and you have to make an initial obstacle roll with a DC of 18 if you roll a 17 or more. You use Acrobatics to avoid the obstacle if you fail. Link to comment
Veiled Malice Posted February 6, 2008 Author Share Posted February 6, 2008 Geez, two nat 20's on that run through. These guys want it, that's for sure. Okay, they are now using the Zig-Zag maneuver, this time in Close Terrain. There's no +2 for you here, and you have to make an initial obstacle roll with a DC of 18 if you roll a 17 or more. You use Acrobatics to avoid the obstacle if you fail. Link to comment
Veiled Malice Posted February 6, 2008 Author Share Posted February 6, 2008 Geez, two nat 20's on that run through. These guys want it, that's for sure. Okay, they are now using the Zig-Zag maneuver, this time in Close Terrain. There's no +2 for you here, and you have to make an initial obstacle roll with a DC of 18 if you roll a 17 or more. You use Acrobatics to avoid the obstacle if you fail. Link to comment
Thevshi Posted February 6, 2008 Share Posted February 6, 2008 Rolled and posted before I saw this. I rolled a 24 with the +2, so that is 22 without it. Link to comment
Thevshi Posted February 6, 2008 Share Posted February 6, 2008 Rolled and posted before I saw this. I rolled a 24 with the +2, so that is 22 without it. Link to comment
Thevshi Posted February 6, 2008 Share Posted February 6, 2008 Rolled and posted before I saw this. I rolled a 24 with the +2, so that is 22 without it. Link to comment
Veiled Malice Posted February 6, 2008 Author Share Posted February 6, 2008 Okay, so you're a bit behind now. Just goes to show what good luck does for you, I guess. I'll get back to this tonight. Link to comment
Veiled Malice Posted February 6, 2008 Author Share Posted February 6, 2008 Okay, so you're a bit behind now. Just goes to show what good luck does for you, I guess. I'll get back to this tonight. Link to comment
Veiled Malice Posted February 6, 2008 Author Share Posted February 6, 2008 Okay, so you're a bit behind now. Just goes to show what good luck does for you, I guess. I'll get back to this tonight. Link to comment
Thevshi Posted February 6, 2008 Share Posted February 6, 2008 Their good luck combined with my bad :roll: Link to comment
Thevshi Posted February 6, 2008 Share Posted February 6, 2008 Their good luck combined with my bad :roll: Link to comment
Thevshi Posted February 6, 2008 Share Posted February 6, 2008 Their good luck combined with my bad :roll: Link to comment
Thevshi Posted February 8, 2008 Share Posted February 8, 2008 And once more with a bad roll. But I guess if I am to roll badly on something, Initiative is the place for tha to be A 38 Link to comment
Thevshi Posted February 8, 2008 Share Posted February 8, 2008 And once more with a bad roll. But I guess if I am to roll badly on something, Initiative is the place for tha to be A 38 Link to comment
Thevshi Posted February 8, 2008 Share Posted February 8, 2008 And once more with a bad roll. But I guess if I am to roll badly on something, Initiative is the place for tha to be A 38 Link to comment
Thevshi Posted February 9, 2008 Share Posted February 9, 2008 And bad rolls continue, hopefully he's flat footed. I don't know what it is about this game that jinxes me. Link to comment
Thevshi Posted February 9, 2008 Share Posted February 9, 2008 And bad rolls continue, hopefully he's flat footed. I don't know what it is about this game that jinxes me. Link to comment
Thevshi Posted February 9, 2008 Share Posted February 9, 2008 And bad rolls continue, hopefully he's flat footed. I don't know what it is about this game that jinxes me. Link to comment
Veiled Malice Posted February 9, 2008 Author Share Posted February 9, 2008 Probably did, but something went wrong with the tag. I can't see the roll. What was it? Link to comment
Veiled Malice Posted February 9, 2008 Author Share Posted February 9, 2008 Probably did, but something went wrong with the tag. I can't see the roll. What was it? Link to comment
Veiled Malice Posted February 9, 2008 Author Share Posted February 9, 2008 Probably did, but something went wrong with the tag. I can't see the roll. What was it? Link to comment
Thevshi Posted February 9, 2008 Share Posted February 9, 2008 Fixed the tab, but it was a 12 Link to comment
Thevshi Posted February 9, 2008 Share Posted February 9, 2008 Fixed the tab, but it was a 12 Link to comment
Thevshi Posted February 9, 2008 Share Posted February 9, 2008 Fixed the tab, but it was a 12 Link to comment
Thevshi Posted February 10, 2008 Share Posted February 10, 2008 Made a bluff check (or diplomacy, as their the same) and got a 19. That roll is without her +8 from 2 ranks of Attractive, so if that factors in, it would be a 27 :) Link to comment
Recommended Posts